you sound like a paranoid stoner hippie with that comment about government conspiracies.the war on drugs is wrong because you have the right to put whatever you want into your own body, whether it's harmful or benign. This is set forth in the constitution and bill of rights (it lists the specific powers given to the government and then says that only those listed are powers of the government--the authority to decide what substances you take is not one of them!)as for the government getting "rich" off the illegal war on drugs, that's absurd. it could really rake in the money if it legalized drugs and then taxed and regulated them. in fact the government spends billions of dollars a year fighting this "war." billions of your taxdollars (if you pay taxes).no, the war on drugs is wrong because our whole system of government was originally set up so that I wouldn't be my brother's keeper and the government certainly wouldn't be my keeper. each american should succeed or fail on his own efforts and abilities. and when he succeeds he shouldn't be punished for his succeess by rediculously "progressive" taxes. if he fails, the government shouldn't be there to pick him up and brush him off, either. the only role of the government is defending us from threats abroad and domestic.as for your dismissing of the war on terror, i'm confused. did 19 muslim terrorists fly jets into our buildings on 9/11, did other muslim terrorist bomb the USS Cole, bomb US embassies in Africa, bomb the world trade center (the first time in '93), and vow to destroy us at every opportunity? if so, i don't see how the war on terror is fictional.it's our freedoms, among other things, that make the terrorists hate us. the freedom to use whatever drugs we see fit should be among them, even if it makes the terrorist hate us even more for being an infidel nation. you don't defeat evil by appeasing it, nor by dismissing it.