Genetically Modified 'Marijuana Food' Contest Could End Prohibition
Then there's this very interesting thought that right now there's no states with laws against genetically modified "Marijuana Food." It's not likely that there's a ban against cannabis cantaloupes on any state law books at this time.
Sun, Sep 07, 2008 9:22 pm
Source: nolanchart.com
Are you ready for some Cannabis cantaloupe? How about some Ganga Grapes? And don't forget the Bong Beans!
These seemingly fantastical fruits and beans could be in your food lexicon some day according to a nationwide group of marijuana legalization advocates. Their having a contest to grow "marijuana food," where the winner (they claim) could easily be a multi-millionaire.
All the organizers are looking for is someone to develop any common food that produces the active ingredients in marijuana. The group's spokesman, Clifford Schaffer, says that he and his group believe that genetically modified "marijuana food" could be on the market in less than five years.
A bold claim to be sure, but Schaffer points out that, "A bright college biology student could do it." He does go on to add that it would have to be "an inspired student," to unlock the marijuana-meets-mainstream food availability.
The organizers - see marijuanaPrize.com - are telling prospective winners that they can select anything they find in a typical grocery store, including fruits, vegetables, and nuts. They hint that the best candidates are plants that produce essential oils.
Regular lawn grass, or lactobcilius, which is used to produce yogurt, are also eligible on their broad guideline list. Now this group figures it will probably take a year - even genius takes time I suppose - before the first candidates roll out their entries. Their so excited about this whole contest that their saying it's possible to have pot products commercially in five years. One has to wonder why five, instead of six years for the forecast.
But why do this at all? Think about medical marijuana patients, the organization asks?
Those that can't smoke can now eat pot peaches or something else that doesn't require firing it up. It would be easy on the lungs. You can't deny that.
Then there's this very interesting thought that right now there's no states with laws against genetically modified "marijuana food." At least not yet. It's not very likely that there's a ban against cannabis cantaloupes on any state's law books at this time.
The benefits would be enormous. It would be the end of prohibition on pot an enthusiastic Schaffer said. Can you see the cops trying to tell some Kush from corn? They'll be confiscating potatoes, peanuts, and your produce! In the end the authorities will capitulate and legalize it. Cops are going to be wondering why people are smiling as they cut their lawns, Schaffer proudly predicted.
Just think of the confusion as rattled cops trying to tell weed melon from watermelon, or stoner berries from strawberries without laboratory tests? How are they going to prove the average gardener isn't growing killer cannabis in disguise?
So, for all these wonderful things to happen we don't just wiggle our noses, we go in search for a budding genius in one of the countries colleges (my guess would be Humboldt State University, or San Francisco University) to find a new legend that will make Johnny Appleseed a forgotten folk hero.
I like to think about people everywhere, eating their lunch on the job, and going back to it in an altered state. There would be less violence and probably more productivity as people focused on what they were doing with new intensity.
Will someone actually come up with a way to modify food and plants in the future? Only time will tell. Meanwhile, if you're a biologist, here's an opportunity to make your reputation and wealth in one brilliant breakthrough. Kinda humbling when you think about it.
As It Stands, my biggest concern with a breakthrough like this would be the "munchies," as we already have a weight problem in this country!






» add a comment
Me again
Dec 7 2008, 11:25 pm
Me
Dec 7 2008, 11:18 pm
Andrew Apel
Sep 18 2008, 11:15 am
http://www.gmobelus.com/news.php?viewStory=182
blu
Sep 17 2008, 9:12 pm
Hey umm
Sep 15 2008, 3:59 am
umm
Sep 14 2008, 11:11 am
I saw it, and am at a loss as to why I was refered there.
Good times:)
♥
Hey umm
Sep 14 2008, 5:25 am
umm
Sep 14 2008, 3:39 am
The meanings of the noun "high" are as follows:
Main Entry: high
Function: noun
Date: 13th century
1: an elevated place or region: as a: hill , knoll b: the space overhead : sky —usually used with on c: heaven —usually used with on
2: a region of high barometric pressure —called also anticyclone
3 a: a high point or level : height b: the transmission gear of a vehicle (as an automobile) giving the highest speed of travel
4 a: an excited, euphoric, or stupefied state produced by or as if by a drug b: a state of elation or high spirits
I was speaking below about the 1st and 4th definitions combined. I see nothing retarded to glimps of heaven while here on this beautiful earth.
But thats just me♥
umm
Sep 12 2008, 4:37 pm
♥
to below
Sep 12 2008, 8:48 am
AND
Sep 12 2008, 7:17 am
Hey umm
Sep 12 2008, 7:10 am
Your definition of that word is only meant to trivialize the posters statement .
Yes , you can feel to good . There are a lot of people jailed or fined if not dead because they felt to good ya fuckin nut .
High also means : up in the air , the opposite of the word low and the level of water in a river after a storm ... but they don't apply either ...................
umm
Sep 11 2008, 2:06 am
Well, being high is just feeling good.
Is it therefore possible to feel too good? I'd like to think its not possible. Its just that the average puppet is conditioned to think other wise maybe...I don't know for sure, but you know where I'm coming from?
Hughes
Sep 10 2008, 9:02 pm
Bloody Yank
Sep 10 2008, 6:24 pm
anonymous
Sep 10 2008, 1:55 pm
umm
Sep 9 2008, 9:39 am
Not Impressed
Sep 9 2008, 6:44 am
pleasant taste
Sep 9 2008, 2:07 am
SATAN
Sep 8 2008, 9:54 pm
It was like a mixture of Orange,Grapefruit and someting else. To be honest I did not pay that much attention to it, but I do remember him saying it had been genetically cross breed.
don't fear science, dude!
Sep 8 2008, 7:48 pm
@ASH
Sep 8 2008, 7:25 pm
Get back to Saudi. I here that it is hot there.
Nigtmove
Sep 8 2008, 6:57 pm
PurpleUrkel9571
Sep 8 2008, 6:32 pm
Dale
Sep 8 2008, 4:22 pm
420Viper
Sep 8 2008, 1:49 pm
This will also get rid of the drug tests for jobs. How can you tell a canna-apple from a regular one? Cereals made from weed-wheat. Here's hoping the CEO of Home Depot eats some Cheerios made from oat flour with some extra "cheer" in it.
zachh
Sep 8 2008, 11:35 am
malaka
Sep 8 2008, 9:11 am
The Dole
Sep 8 2008, 6:37 am
Dex
Sep 8 2008, 3:01 am
Heres a few other ideas totally off the subject. Take your bong water, put it in water guns fill water balloons and squirt and balloon police cars. It will probably drive K-9 units completely insane. Dispose of bong water where ever drug dogs frequent. Same thing with stems and leaves. Just don't get caught doing it :-) I found that small, compact water guns and spray bottles work very well.
If you don't grow, take your seeds and scatter them outside, or feed them to the birds. Not all birds can digest them and will pass them, naturally scattering the seeds. If the plant grows out of control, can law enforcement control it? If you have the gonads, you might even toss your seeds into a cops back or front yard... if you know where one lives.
Just food for thought...
Over grow America
Ash
Sep 8 2008, 1:55 am
Also, 'their' refers to something someone owns i.e. possessive, whereas 'they're' refers to something 'they are' doing, get it? Don't further the stereotype of "dumb stoners" because one really has nothing to do with the other. There are dumbasses and smart people and all in between, and a bunch of us smoke that bomb chronic everyday :)
not unheard of
Sep 8 2008, 12:36 am
anonymous
Sep 7 2008, 11:58 pm
RYAN M.
Sep 7 2008, 10:31 pm
lsd
Sep 7 2008, 10:17 pm
anonymous
Sep 7 2008, 10:10 pm
Grammar Nazi Stoner
Sep 7 2008, 10:08 pm
chris
Sep 7 2008, 9:32 pm
» add a comment